Re: Groopers Repoog!

[Dieter Opfer <dopfer@CSU.edu.au>]

Groopers repoog is not a palindrome.

Groopers srepoorg would be but a true palindrome needs to make sense in both
directions eg noon

Dieter :)#

DanielBron@aol.com wrote:

> Kevin wrote:
>
> > Another argument in favor of "Grooper". Makes a nice spoonerism: "True
> > Grooper=Groo Trooper".
>
> Now who could argue with impeccable logic like that?
>
> -TGD (here come the PSes)
>
> PS:   Butterflies flutter by.
>
> PPS:  Groopers Repoog!
>
> PPPS:  That last bit was a palindrome.
>
> PPPPS:  Hmmm hmm hmm hmmm...
>
> PPPPPS:  Oh?  Am I supposed to go now?  Ok, ok.
>
> PPPPPPS:  Am I gone yet?  No?  Well, I'll try again.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Hey!  Did you know there's meat in these things?