[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Groopers Repoog!
Groopers repoog is not a palindrome.
Groopers srepoorg would be but a true palindrome needs to make sense in both
directions eg noon
Dieter :)#
DanielBron@aol.com wrote:
> Kevin wrote:
>
> > Another argument in favor of "Grooper". Makes a nice spoonerism: "True
> > Grooper=Groo Trooper".
>
> Now who could argue with impeccable logic like that?
>
> -TGD (here come the PSes)
>
> PS: Butterflies flutter by.
>
> PPS: Groopers Repoog!
>
> PPPS: That last bit was a palindrome.
>
> PPPPS: Hmmm hmm hmm hmmm...
>
> PPPPPS: Oh? Am I supposed to go now? Ok, ok.
>
> PPPPPPS: Am I gone yet? No? Well, I'll try again.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Hey! Did you know there's meat in these things?