[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Free E-mail???

This story has been going around for a while, and it's not true
folks.  This is a release from the USPS website.
Good thing it's not true..if we had to pay for e-mail how could afford
new Groos?

     May 21, 1999
     Release No. 45


     WASHINGTON ? A completely false rumor concerning the U.S. Postal
Service is
     being circulated on Internet e-mail. As a matter of fact, the
Postal Service has
     learned that a similar hoax occurred recently in Canada
concerning Canada Post.

     The e-mail message claims that a "Congressman Schnell" has
introduced "Bill 602P"
     to allow the federal government to impose a 5-cent surcharge on
each e-mail
     message delivered over the Internet. The money would be collected
by Internet
     Service Providers and then turned over to the Postal Service.

     No such proposed legislation exists. In fact, no "Congressman
Schnell" exists.

     The U.S. Postal Service has no authority to surcharge e-mail
messages sent over the
     Internet, nor would it support such legislation.



Groosum wrote:

> Hey, this might affect us;( Sorry about the non-Groo post )
> The last few months have revealed an alarming trend in the
> Government of the United States attempting to quietly push
> through legislation that will affect your use of the Internet.
> Under proposed legislation the U.S. Postal Service will be
> attempting to bilk email users out of "alternate postage fees."
> Bill 602P will permit the Federal Govt. to charge a 5 cent
> surcharge on every email delivered, by billing Internet Service
> Providers at source. The consumer would then be billed in turn by
> the ISP. Washington DC lawyer Richard Stepp is working without
> pay to prevent this legislation from becoming law.
> The U.S. Postal Service is claiming that lost revenue due to the
> proliferation of email is costing nearly $230,000,000 in revenue
> per year. You may have noticed their recent ad campaign "There is
> nothing like a letter." Since the average citizen received about
> 10 pieces of email per day in 1998, the cost to the typical
> individual would be an additional 50 cents per day, or over $180
> dollars per year, above and beyond their regular Internet costs.
> Note that this would be money paid directly to the U.S. Postal
> Service for a service they do not even provide. The whole point of
> the Internet is democracy and noninterference. If the federal
> government is permitted to tamper with our liberties by adding a
> surcharge to email, who knows where it will end. You are already
> paying an exorbitant price for snail mail because of bureaucratic
> inefficiency. It currently takes up to 6 days for a letter to be
> delivered from New York to Buffalo.
> If the U.S. Postal Service is allowed to tinker with email, it
> will mark the end of the "free" Internet in the United States. One
> congressman, Tony Schnell (r) has even suggested a "twenty to
> forty dollar per month surcharge on all Internet service" above
> and beyond the government's proposed email charges. Note that most
> of the major newspapers have ignored the story, the only exception
> being the Washingtonian which called the idea of email surcharge
> "a useful concept who's time has come" in a March 6th,1999
> Editorial. Don't sit by and watch your freedoms erode away!
> Send this email to all Americans on your list and tell your
> friends and relatives to write to their congressman and say "No!"
> to Bill 602P.
> Kate Turner
> Assistant to Richard Stepp
> Berger, Stepp and Gorman
> Attorneys at Law
> 216 Concorde Street
> Vienna, Va.
> --
> ------------------------------
> Groosum - "Into the fray!"
> ------------------------------

If a person with multiple personalities threatens suicide,
is that considered a hostage situation?