[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: I dig chicks named Anna

The only problem I can see is that usually someone on
the list starts with an on topic post, adds a PS to
the end and then someone else replies without changing
the subject line so everyone else thinks it is still
on topic but it only has a reply to the PS. or
something like that.  
I really enjoy all of the posts whether they are on or
off topic.  I have become somewhat of a lurker as of
late, but I still read all of the posts.  I will
always be a part of the Groop and never want to see
any of the zaniness that is the Groop to go away.

Just my kopins worth.
Tony Dodds -aka Grundor

--- DanielBron@aol.com wrote:
> I really hate to do this, but:
> Look, I am usually not one to join a conversation
> about netiquette.  I thinks 
> it pedantic; but in this case I'll make an
> exception.  
> I subscribe to this mailing list for one reason:  
> Humor.  Granted, I joined 
> it beccause I was interested in Groo, but I STAYED
> because I was (and still 
> am) interested in the Groop.  You guys really give
> me a belly laugh (I've got 
> the belly for it) at least once a week.  Sometimes
> twice, if I'm naughty.  It 
> gets me down when the Groop becomes quiet.  And the
> thing that usually brings 
> out the best in a Grooper is a good,
> long-since-should-have-died running gag. 
>  That means someone says something mildly ridiculous
> (Erin), and someone else 
> responds, and someone else responds to that, ad
> hilarium.  It's a chain 
> reaction.  And it only gets bigger and funnier. The
> longer it goes, the more 
> clever and more ridiculous the endless string of
> one-up-respondances become.  
> I, for one, am TOTALLY, ABSOLUTELY, and
> UNEQUIVOCALLY for off-topic posts.  
> If we only did on-topic posts, this list would be
> DEAD.  I also understand 
> that no one is saying there shouldn't be off-topic
> posts, but that perhaps, 
> if we send an off-topic post,  we should mark it as
> such.  I say, given the 
> ratio of off- to on-topic posts on this list, we
> should mark ON-TOPIC posts 
> as such (It just logically makes more sense).  
> Thus, I submit, the subject 
> line for all posts which are ON-topic, must, now and
> forever, contain the 
> characters [OT].
> And further, to those who can't tell directly from
> the subject whether a post 
> is on or off topic:  GO SCRATCH.  For an example,
> check out my subject.  If 
> you can't figure out that this post is off-topic,
> then you truly deserve the 
> title of Grooper.  A similar argument goes for
> replies to off-topic posts.  
> If a post named "your boat" is off topic, then
> clearly so will be "Re:  your 
> boat", and "Re:  Re:  your boat", and "Re:  Re:  Re:
>  your boat".   Get it?  
> All right then.
> -TGD
> PS: Gabe: Gentlemen do not "curtesy".  Gentlemen
> bow. 

Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com