[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GrooFest 2000
- To: Gary Grossmann <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, George_Karalias@avid.com, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, MuslinCrow@worldnet.att.net, Superzeus@aol.com, SheikOfEntropy@aol.com, JKozicki@ADESA.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: GrooFest 2000
- From: Greg Craill <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 08:02:02 -0800 (PST)
Hey count me in, dunno how practical it is to fly from saudi just to meet you dessesbo types, but
then again you can call me slow of mind but i'll turn up if I can wangle vacations at the right
ps Nate - my bro said he sent the money to you for TWE back issues - did you receive this ?
--- Gary Grossmann <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Hi Folks!
> Well, there has been very little response to my e-mail about altering the
> concept of GrooFest 2000. So here is my question:
> Who is still up for all of us getting together at San Diego and taking it
> from there? At the very least, we can get together while meeting the entire
> Groo Crew.
> Please respond to just me or "reply to all" for this message. After I get
> feedback from you folks and "talk" to Mark", I'll put the mesasage out to
> the whole Groop if it looks like going to the Con is what we'll be doing.
> Thanks and take care -Gary G.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gary Grossmann" <email@example.com>
> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>; <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>;
> <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>; <email@example.com>;
> <firstname.lastname@example.org>; <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>;
> <George_Karalias@avid.com>; <email@example.com>;
> <firstname.lastname@example.org>; <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>;
> <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>; <email@example.com>;
> <firstname.lastname@example.org>; <email@example.com>;
> <firstname.lastname@example.org>; <email@example.com>;
> <MuslinCrow@worldnet.att.net>; <Superzeus@aol.com>;
> <SheikOfEntropy@aol.com>; <JKozicki@ADESA.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2000 10:31 PM
> Subject: GrooFest 2000
> > Hi Folks!
> > OK, here is the whole history of GrooFest 2000 up to this point.
> > Unfortunately, it's pretty short. This should have gone to everyone who
> > expressed an interest in GrooFest 2000. If you have expressed an interest
> > and didn't receive this message, please let me know. Uuummm. Wait a
> > minute. Forget that last part.
> > I saw Sergio in Seattle in late 1998 and I half-jokingly suggested that we
> > have a Groo Convention in Ojai, where he lives. He said there would not
> > enough people to have a convention, but we could get some folks together
> > lunch and then go on a tour of his studio. Thus, the idea for GrooFest
> > was born. When I saw him again at San Diego, I asked him if he really
> > wanted to do something like that. He said sure, so I announced it to the
> > Groop and about 20 folks bringing a total of 30 people said they were
> > interested in coming and a few others have expressed interest since then.
> > also figured out that most folks would like to go to the San Diego Con in
> > conjunction with GrooFest, so right before or right after would be best.
> > far, so good.
> > Meanwhile, Mark e-mailed me to say that Sergio figured there would be
> > 5-6 people and he (Mark) wasn't sure what Sergio would think about 20-30
> > folks descending on Ojai. Oops! Did I Err?
> > Meanwhile, I wrote (faxed per his instructions) Sergio telling him about
> > response and asking if we should forget the whole thing, but if not, what
> > time would work out best for him. He had told me in San Diego to just
> > figure out a time, but I didn't think that meant to just bull ahead
> > his OK and obviously felt that way a lot more after what Mark wrote me.
> > Unfortunately, no response from Sergio.
> > So I wrote him another letter with a self-addressed stamp and a little
> > attachment whereby he could just check a few boxes to say to forget the
> > whole thing or what time would be good. Unfortunately, still no answer.
> > guess is he put it on a chair or something and it got under a bunch of
> > that he intends to get to, but are not urgent. If you've seen his studio,
> > this would make sense.
> > So I e-mailed Mark and asked for his assistance as a go-between, which I
> > hoping to avoid. Here is the response I got on December 3:
> > >So naturally, I turn to you (you who have so foolishly opened yourself up
> > to
> > >and even welcomed direct communication with us nutballs in the Groop) for
> > >advice. Thanks in advance and take care -Gary G.
> > ME: Sergio is out of the country at the moment and fiercely behind on
> > deadlines, to boot. When he gets back and gets a free moment, I'll
> > ask him about it.
> > And that's it. As of 7 weeks ago, Sergio was behind on deadlines while
> > running around the world as he loves to do and Mark is doing his usual
> > of pushing to get things done while at the same time protecting Sergio
> > distractions, including us. (btw, it never ceases to amaze me the volume
> > work and number of projects Mark works on while still answering e-mails
> > participating in newsgroup dialogues, etc.)
> > My intention is to ask Mark at the first of February if he's had a chance
> > talk to Sergio or if I should write him again or even call him. I figure
> > months is enough time to wait.
> > In the meantime, since things are NOT coming together very well at this
> > point and virtually everyone wants to go to the San Diego con, I suggest,
> > I said before, we begin to plan a different version or concept of GrooFest
> > 2000 whereby we all get together at the Con and descend on Sergio & Stan &
> > Mark & Tom at the Con where descending "en masse" is definitely OK. If we
> > can work out something special with the Groo Crew, great. You never know.
> > If not, well so what. Being there and meeting the Groo Crew and each
> > is special enough.
> > So what do you all think?
> > btw, I the more I think about it, the more I like the idea of a T-shirt,
> > and/or button that says something like "I'm a Member of the Groop!" Maybe
> > not having art would actually be the best way to go. We make it kind of
> > stark, so it is very easy to spot. (I guarentee Sergio would be happy to
> > sign them at the con) And Nate, don't worry, you won't be acosted. I had
> > hardly any questions about my Groo hat in either '98 or '99. Most people,
> > shockingly, are not there to see Sergio and those who are are,
> > almost invariably polite.
> > Don't respond to the whole Groop. Things will just get more confusing
> > we actually come up with a plan.
> > Take care all -Gary G.
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.